Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Case Study No. 2

Case Study No. 2

Q CASE STUDY MEMORANDUM #2 From Labor Relations in the United States Employment Service Reorganization: 1. This assignment must be written in memo format. See the second page for a template of the proper memorandum heading and memorandum subdivisions and proper spacing. Points will be deducted for adding extra space to avoid writing three full pages. 2. Your memorandum must be written in twelve (12) point font, Times New Roman, and double spaced with one inch margins on the left, right, top, and bottom. Your memorandum must be at least three FULL pages, but no more than five pages. 3. For any sources you elect to use, please cite these sources using APA format. 4. Read the entire case study. 5. There can be several correct answers. The purpose of this assignment is for you to contemplate real life situations and decision making. You must fully answer each question and reflect, in depth, why you have provided that response. THIS MUST BE YOUR OWN WORK! 6. This assignment is due at the end of the day on Friday, July 16, 2021. CASE STUDY MEMORANDUM NO. 2 DATE: Friday, July 16, 2021 FROM: (Insert YOUR name here) TO: Prof. Diaz RE: LABOR RELATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES EMPLOYMENT SERVICE REORGANIZATION I. What is at stake for the new Secretary of Labor? What objectives should he be trying to satisfy? Start your answer here. II. What were management and labor's intentions and objectives? Start your answer here. III. What were the union's concerns? Why were they opposed? Start your answer here. IV. What should Usery do? Start your answer here.

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

The stake for the new Secretary of Labor is his reputation. This is because the reputation of the previous Secretary of Labor had become at stake for which there had been dissatisfaction among the members of the concerned Labor Department’s subunit. The dissatisfaction had been about the ways in which uncertainty of the future of the members had been developed. The decision-making for reorganization had been made by the management of the organization named USES. However, this decision had not been appropriate as per the perspectives of the members of the concerned Labor Department’s subunit.